Home > Cost-Effective Threshold Price for Alternative Infant and Neonatal Rotavirus Vaccines: A Dual-Country Evaluation

This preprint study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of alternative infant and neonatal rotavirus vaccination strategies in Malawi and Ghana, with a particular focus on the neonatal RV3-BB vaccine candidate. The analysis used a dynamic transmission model and full incremental cost-effectiveness framework to compare current national immunization programmes with alternative schedules, including Rotarix, Rotavac, and neonatal RV3-BB vaccination. The study explored how vaccine price, duration of protection, and implementation costs influence the optimal vaccination strategy in two Gavi-supported African countries with different financing and vaccine transition contexts.

Key findings and insights

  • Introducing the neonatal RV3-BB vaccine produced the largest reductions in rotavirus disease burden in both countries, reducing moderate-to-severe cases by 18% in Malawi and 25% in Ghana compared with current programmes.
  • At base-case assumptions, RV3-BB was associated with substantial health gains and cost savings, averting approximately 44,000 DALYs in Malawi and 87,000 DALYs in Ghana over 2025–2034.
  • RV3-BB was more likely to be the preferred strategy at moderate willingness-to-pay thresholds, particularly when vaccine prices remained low and protection lasted longer than approximately 40 weeks.
  • Suspending rotavirus vaccination substantially increased disease burden and mortality in both countries, despite appearing cost-saving at very low willingness-to-pay thresholds.
  • The study identified uncertainty around vaccine delivery costs, RV3-BB pricing, and duration of protection as major drivers of decision uncertainty, highlighting the importance of additional evidence generation for next-generation rotavirus vaccines.

How can the findings be used?

This analysis provides timely evidence for countries, Gavi, and partners assessing future rotavirus vaccine product choices as newer vaccines enter the market. The findings are particularly relevant for countries transitioning through different Gavi co-financing phases and considering how vaccine pricing, delivery costs, and durability of protection should shape sustainable immunization financing and vaccine introduction decisions.

Thumbnail image credit: Gavi

  • LanguageEnglish

Submit your work

Any organization or individual working in the field of immunization economics can submit findings, opportunities, calls to action, or other relevant work below to be shared with our community.