Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Outreach and Catch-Up Campaign Strategies for Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccination in Chuuk, Federated States of Micronesia

Home > Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Routine Outreach and Catch-Up Campaign Strategies for Measles, Mumps, and Rubella Vaccination in Chuuk, Federated States of Micronesia

This peer-reviewed article evaluates the cost-effectiveness of different outreach strategies to increase measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination coverage among children aged 12 months to 6 years in Chuuk, Federated States of Micronesia. Using a cost-effectiveness model over a 5-year horizon, the study compares routine outreach (quarterly and biannual) and catch-up campaign strategies from a public health perspective. 

Key findings

  • Quarterly routine outreach was the most effective strategy, achieving the highest number of protected children and protected person-months (PPMs)
  • Biannual routine outreach was the least costly but also least effective strategy
  • Quarterly routine outreach (vs status quo) generated approximately 7001 additional PPMs and 132 additional doses, at ~$3.65 per PPM
  • Catch-up campaigns delivered higher coverage per event but were more resource-intensive than routine outreach
  • More frequent outreach improves timeliness of vaccination, increasing cumulative protection over time
  • Results were sensitive to assumptions on coverage achieved during outreach events and implementation costs

 

How can the findings be used?

These findings can inform decisions on optimizing vaccination delivery strategies in remote and resource-constrained settings, particularly when balancing frequency of outreach, costs, and coverage gains.

Thumbnail image credit: Marek Okon on Unsplash

  • LanguageEnglish

Submit your work

Any organization or individual working in the field of immunization economics can submit findings, opportunities, calls to action, or other relevant work below to be shared with our community.