Public Health and Economic Impact of transitioning to a 20-valent pneumococcal vaccine in Kazakhstan’s Pediatric National Immunization Program

Home > Public Health and Economic Impact of transitioning to a 20-valent pneumococcal vaccine in Kazakhstan’s Pediatric National Immunization Program

This preprint research article evaluates the health and economic impact of transitioning to a 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) within Kazakhstan’s pediatric national immunization program. Using a decision-analytic Markov model (payer perspective) over a 10-year horizon, the study compares PCV20 (2+1 and 3+1 schedules) with currently available vaccines (PCV13 and PCV10-SII). 

Key findings

  • PCV20 (both 2+1 and 3+1 schedules) was cost-saving and more effective (dominant) compared to PCV13 and PCV10-SII
  • Switching from PCV13 to PCV20 (2+1) could avert over 196,000 disease cases and 5,127 deaths over 10 years
  • PCV20 introduction was associated with substantial cost savings (e.g., ~108,701 million ₸ savings vs PCV13 for 2+1 schedule)
  • Results were robust across sensitivity and scenario analyses, with PCV20 remaining cost-saving in most simulations
  • Delaying PCV20 introduction by 2 years would lead to additional cases, deaths, and healthcare costs, with increasing losses over time
  • Early implementation generates greater benefits due to both direct and indirect effects, which increase over time

How can the findings be used?

These findings can inform decisions on introducing higher-valent pneumococcal vaccines, highlighting both the potential health gains and cost savings, as well as the importance of timely adoption in national immunization programs.

Thumbnail image credit: Photo by Ilyas Dautov on Unsplash

  • LanguageEnglish

Submit your work

Any organization or individual working in the field of immunization economics can submit findings, opportunities, calls to action, or other relevant work below to be shared with our community.